I hope to expose the fallacy of certain efforts to construct parallelisms or juxtapositions that wish to reconcile histories of Zionism and the Palestinian condition. Even if expressly disavowed, this symmetry enshrines an asymmetry that erases Palestinian sources and points of view in the name of recognition. Alongside others in his field, Bartov may speak of the present genocide and attain respect precisely because of how their academic careers and the disciplines they helped establish have denied the genocidal nature of Israel and the Nakba. In other words, their confidence in naming today’s genocide is enabled by a theoretical and intellectual discourse—with its endowments and institutions—where Nakba denial has been the norm. Without revisiting their own historical writings about the Nakba, they relegate the Nakba (and prior events) to an altogether other history outside of today’s continuing Nakba.
Continue reading at https://www.parapraxismagazine.com/articles/nakba-denial
